A novel technique for placing titanium mesh with porous polyethylene via the endoscopic transnasal approach into the orbit for medial orbital wall fractures

Article information

Arch Plast Surg. 2019;46(5):421-425

Publication date (electronic) : 2019 September 15

doi : https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.00703

Seong Hwan Bae^1,2, Dae Kyun Jeong¹, Ju Young Go³, Heeseung Park⁴, Joo Hyoung Kim¹, Jae Woo Lee¹, Taewoo Kang^,4

¹Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea

²Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea

³TAE Plastic Surgery Clinic, Busan, Korea

⁴Busan Cancer Center, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea

Correspondence: Taewoo Kang Busan Cancer Center, Pusan National University Hospital, 179 Gudeok-ro, Seo-gu, Busan 49241, Korea Tel: +82-51-240-7281 Fax: +82-51-240-7746 E-mail: taewoo.kang@pusan.ac.kr

This work was supported by a clinical research grant from Pusan National University Hospital in 2016 (a personal grant to SHB in 2016).

This article was presented at the 8th Research and Reconstruction (R&R) forum on April 19–20, 2018, in Jeonju, Korea.

Received 2019 June 10; Revised 2019 August 23; Accepted 2019 August 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Blowout fractures account for 13.3% of all facial fractures, and medial orbital wall fractures alone account for 0% to 55% of cases [1-3]. Although the incidence of medial orbital wall fractures is not very low, there is currently less consensus regarding the treatment of medial orbital wall fractures than there is for orbital floor fractures [4]. A medial orbital wall fracture that is not treated correctly can cause late enophthalmos and facial asymmetry [5]. Therefore, more research is needed on the optimal treatment of this condition.

Various approaches have been used for the surgical treatment of medial orbital wall fractures. Some of these approaches have disadvantages, such as difficulty in securing sufficient vision for the operation and scarring in the facial area. The endoscopic transnasal approach introduced by Yamaguchi et al. [6] in 1991 is widely used to overcome these shortcomings [7-11].

The endoscopic transnasal approach is often used to fill the nasal cavity with a silicone sheet and Merocel to reconstruct the medial orbital wall. However, this technique has several problems; for instance, the patient must endure considerable discomfort and the risk of surgical site infection increases because the filling materials must be maintained for a long time. To overcome these drawbacks, a method of positioning an absorbable plate in the orbit through the endoscopic transnasal approach has been introduced [12]. However, it is difficult to identify absorbable plates because they are radiolucent, and they also may induce a foreign body reaction [13]. Furthermore, although this is somewhat controversial, it is likely that late enophthalmos can occur after absorption of the plate [14-16].

To overcome these disadvantages, the authors devised a new surgical technique to place a nonabsorbable plate of titanium mesh with porous polyethylene into the orbit endoscopically via the transnasal approach. Here, we report the results of applying this surgical technique in a series of cases.

METHODS

Study patients

From July 2017 to July 2018, 14 patients who were diagnosed with pure medial orbital wall fractures were operated on using the endoscopic transnasal approach. The causes of the fractures were falls in five patients, assaults in three patients, traffic accidents in five patients, and exercise injury in one patient. There were nine males and five females. Three patients complained of diplopia at the time of admission, and six patients complained of gaze limitation. All patients underwent surgery within 2 weeks of the injury (Table 1).

Table 1.

Patient demographics

Surgical procedure

All patients underwent orbital wall reconstruction surgery using the endoscopic transnasal approach under general anesthesia. First, cottonoids soaked with diluted epinephrine (1:100,000) were filled in the middle meatus using a 0° 4-mm-diameter endoscope (Tricam NTSC; Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) to induce atrophy and vasoconstriction of the nasal mucosa. A solution of 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine was injected into the anterior border of the middle turbinate, around the uncinate process, and into the adjacent septum and lateral wall of the middle turbinate. When needed for a sufficient visual field, the anterior part of the middle turbinate was partially resected. An incision was made in the uncinate process using a sickle knife, and the ethmoidal sinus was opened. After identifying the site of the medial orbital wall fracture, the herniated orbital contents were pushed into the orbit. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) images were used to calculate the size of the bone defect due to fracture. The size of the bone defect was calculated by multiplying the width by the height of the defect. The titanium mesh with porous polyethylene (Medpor Titan Barrier sheet; Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) was trimmed to be shorter than the anteroposterior length of the defect and longer than its height (Fig. 1). A 30° endoscope was used to insert a titanium mesh into the bone defect. We placed the implant so that it could be fixed to the uninjured border of the defect (Fig. 2). After pressing the eyeball, we confirmed that the titanium mesh supported the orbital contents. Immediately after the operation, the forced duction test was performed, and the operation was terminated.

Fig. 1.

Titanium mesh with porous polyethylene

A titanium mesh with porous polyethylene was inserted into the bone defect through the endoscopic transnasal approach and positioned in the orbit. The titanium mesh was trimmed to be shorter than the anteroposterior length of the defect and longer than its height.

Fig. 2.

Intraoperative 30° endoscopic view

A case of medial blowout fracture. Medial intraoperative 30° endoscopic view (A) before insertion of the titanium mesh after uncinectomy (B) after insertion of the implant. After pressing the eyeball, the titanium mesh was confirmed to support the orbital contents.

Radiologic examinations

Before and after surgery, CT was performed using the same protocol (120 kV, 280 mAs, 1.0-mm section thickness). Preoperative CT scans were taken within 1 week from the date of injury, and postoperative CT was performed immediately after surgery (Figs. 3-5).

Fig. 3.

Axial computed tomography image

A computed tomography image of a medial blowout fracture. (A) Preoperative. (B) Postoperative.

Fig. 4.

Sagittal computed tomography image

A computed tomography image of a medial blowout fracture. (A) Preoperative. (B) Postoperative.

Fig. 5.

Three-dimensional computed tomography image

A computed tomography image of a medial blowout fracture. (A) Preoperative. (B) Postoperative.

RESULTS

The postoperative CT images showed that the titanium mesh was well-inserted and in the proper position, and that the orbital contents were kept in the orbit. We also confirmed that the symptoms that patients complained of before surgery had resolved after surgery. All patients were discharged within 1 week after surgery without any complications.

DISCUSSION

In 1991, Yamaguchi et al. [6] introduced the endoscopic transnasal approach for reconstruction of medial orbital wall fractures; since then, it has been widely used due to its various advantages, including a wide visual field during the operation and the lack of a subsequent scar on the facial area [7-11]. However, the choice of the implant to be inserted is also important, as well as the approach to the reduction of medial orbital wall fractures. The implant should be determined considering the defect size, associated injuries, age, and donor site morbidity [17]. The ideal orbital implant is biocompatible, easy to obtain, strong enough to provide orbital support, easy to handle, and radiopaque [18]. Various materials have been introduced for the treatment of orbital wall fractures. They can be broadly divided into autologous and alloplastic materials. Alloplastic materials are widely used because they have no donor site morbidity, can reduce the operating time, and are easy to use [19,20].

The combination of a silastic sheet and Merocel used with the endoscopic transnasal approach for reconstruction of the medial orbital wall is cheap, easy to handle, and can provide adequate support for large defects. However, techniques that use these materials require them to be kept in place for a long time, which makes it impossible to avoid patient discomfort and may cause surgical site infection [21]. In the meantime, a method of positioning an absorbable plate in orbit through the transnasal approach has been introduced [12]. Absorbable plates are easy to handle due to their malleability and have the advantage of not requiring removal. However, they may lose their load-bearing capacity before complete healing, and it is difficult to confirm the location of absorbable plates by imaging because of their radiolucency [13,14].

Because of these problems, the authors devised a new surgical technique for inserting a radiopaque nonabsorbable plate into the orbit by the endoscopic transnasal approach. A nonabsorbable plate is harder and difficult to handle than an absorbable plate, so it was trimmed to be shorter than the anteroposterior length of the defect and longer than its height so that the implant could be inserted through the bone defect site. It could be possible to trim the plate to be shorter than the height and longer than the anteroposterior length of the defect. However, when the plate is inserted, the tissue around the bone defect could be damaged by the plate, and we were afraid of damage to the optic nerve. Therefore, the authors chose the former strategy. This allowed the implant to be fixed in proper position by the intact bone around the defect. This method does not require nasal packing, and therefore reduces the risk of complications such as infection and patient discomfort. Additionally, titanium mesh with porous polyethylene has the advantage of being able to maintain its load-bearing capacity permanently, and its position can be identified on postoperative radiological examinations. However, the limitations of this technique are that it is difficult to perform, the operating time is relatively long, and it is likely to be influenced by the skill of the operator. It may also be expected that the mesh will be difficult to remove after insertion. In this study, we confirmed that excellent results were obtained from CT examinations performed immediately after surgery. However, a disadvantage is that no follow-up for more than 6 months was carried out, and no study has explored subsequent complications. The small number of cases is also a limitation of this study. Further research on these issues will be needed in the future, but this surgical technique is expected to be able to overcome the problems of other surgical techniques.

The authors have developed a surgical method of inserting a nonabsorbable titanium mesh with porous polyethylene into the orbit through a transnasal endoscopic approach, and obtained good results, as confirmed by postoperative CT scans. Although additional study is needed, this technique is expected to be another surgical option for medial orbital wall fractures.

Article information Continued