 |
|
A simple clinical assessment of breast animation deformity following direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
Diana Lydia Dyrberg, Gudjon Leifur Gunnarsson, Camilla Bille, Jens Ahm Sørensen, Jørn Bo Thomsen
Arch Plast Surg. 2019;46(6):535-543. Published online 2019 Nov 15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.00493
|
|
Citations to this article as recorded by
 Prevention of Postoperative Complications by Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Yo-Han Kim, Yun-Jung Yang, Dong-Won Lee, Seung-Yong Song, Dae-Hyun Lew, Eun-Jung Yang
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.2024; 153(1): 10e. CrossRef Animation Deformity: Evaluating the Role of Morphotopologic Features in Suggesting Preventive Surgical Procedures
Fumio Onishi, Ayumi Suzuki, Tomomi Yamakawa, Jun Makino, Toshiharu Minabe
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery.2022; 150(6): 1189. CrossRef Evaluation of Breast Animation Deformity following Pre- and Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Diana L. Dyrberg, Camilla Bille, Vibeke Koudahl, Oke Gerke, Jens A. Sørensen, Jørn B. Thomsen
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2022; 49(05): 587. CrossRef Direct-to-Implant Extracellular Matrix Hammock-based Breast Reconstruction; Prepectoral or Subpectoral?
Diana L. Dyrberg, Gudjon L. Gunnarsson, Camilla Bille, Jens A. Sørensen, Jørn B. Thomsen
Trials.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
|