J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg Search

CLOSE


Journal of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2002;29(5):365-371.
Published online September 1, 2002.
Pitfalls and Management of Mandible Angle Reduction.
Sung Su Lee, Won Jai Lee, Beyoung Yun Park
Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. bypark53@yumc. yonsei.ac.kr
Abstract
In general, orientals have a round and broad facial contour. In case of females with prominent mandible angles, the facial contour may look very square-like and unnatural with a masculine image. Recently, due to western aesthetic standards, there tends to be an increase of mandible angle reductions for an oval shaped face. The two methods for mandible angle reduction are curved horizontal ostectomy and angle splitting ostectomy depending on the layer of bone excision. The curved horizontal method may improve the lateral view of the patient but limited improvement is shown on the frontal view due to the lack of reduction of the mandible bone width. The angle splitting ostectomy improves the frontal view by decreasing the mandible bone width but there is limited change on the lateral view due to minimal change of the mandible angle contour. Currently, there are no specific protocols to determine the ideal operation methods for patients with prominent mandible angles. The authors measured the degree of mandible angles of 35 patients with prominent mandible angles and divided them into 3 types; severe <105, moderate 105 - 125, mild > 125. Patients with severe type angles showed best results with both operations combined due to not just the prominence of the angle but the width of the mandible bone. Patients with mild type angles obtained satisfactory results only with angle splitting ostectomy because they could have a natural lateral view. In case of moderate type angles, patients with angles closer to 105 should undergo curved horizontal ostectomy and those with angles closer to 125 should be operated with angle splitting ostectomy for satisfactory results.
Keywords: Mandible angle reduction; Mandible angle; Angle splitting ostectomy and Curved horizontal ostectomy
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 1,334 View
  • 0 Download

Prevention of Complication and Management of Unfavorable Results in Reduction Malarplasty.2008 July;35(4)

Surgical Management of Pyoderma Gangrenosum: A Case Report.2005 January;32(1)

Management of parotid duct injury.1991 September;18(5)

Clinical Features and Management of a Median Cleft Lip2016 May;43(3)

Diagnosis and Management of Ecthyma Gangrenosum in Chronic Renal Failure Patient2014 May;41(3)



ABOUT
ARTICLE & SPECIALITY
Article category

Browse all articles >

Speciality

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
101-2003, Lotte Castle President, 109, Mapodaero, Mapo-gu, Seoul 04146, Korea
E-mail: apsedit@gmail.com                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next