The Effect of Nasal Packing with Rolled Silastic Sheet after Closed Reduction of Nasal Bone Fracture.

Son, Kyung Min; Yang, Jeong Yeol; Kim, Gyu Bo; Han, Yun Ju; Cheon, Ji Seon

Search: J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg Search

CLOSE

Original Article

Journal of the Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2011;38(5):602-608.
Published online September 1, 2011.

The Effect of Nasal Packing with Rolled Silastic Sheet after Closed Reduction of Nasal Bone Fracture.

Kyung Min Son, Jeong Yeol Yang, Gyu Bo Kim, Yun Ju Han, Ji Seon Cheon

¹Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea. jyyang@chosun.ac.kr
²Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Nasal bone fracture is the most common type of facial bone fracture and most of nasal bone fracture is combined with septal fracture frequently. Nasal septum is important to support the distal nose and to maintain the nasal airway. But nasal septal fractures are usually unrecognized and untreated at the time of operation. Recently, various materials were using for nasal packing after closed reduction, however these materials are not focused on the correction of nasal bone and nasal septal fracture and many patients are suffered from nasal packing materials. Thus, the purpose of this study is to compare routine packing materials and rolled silastic sheet with respect to postoperative effect of correction of nasal bone fracture and discomfort of nasal packing materials. METHODS: We examined 320 patients treated nasal bone fracture from January 2008 to December 2010. For Group I(n=92), Merocel(R) was used for nasal packing, for Group II(n=152) vaseline gauze was used, and Rolled silastic sheet(RSS) with vaseline gauze packing(VGP) was used for Group III(n=76). Under the general anesthesia, all patients were operated by closed reduction and nasal packing was done using three kinds of packing materials. At the time of postoperative 7 days, packing material was removed and studied for pt's satisfaction and postop. complications.
RESULTS
In patients with RSS with VGP, the complaints (nasal obstruction, foreign compressive sensation and discomfort during food ingestion) of keeping the nasal packing were decreased(p<0.05) and the postoperative complication(deviation) were decreased comparing to vaseline gauze packing and Merocel(R) packing, however, these differences were not statistically significant(p>0.05).
CONCLUSION
Postoperative nasal packing with RSS with VGP was more comfortable to the patients and it was more effective method to correct the nasal bone fracture and nasal septal fracture.

Keywords: Rolled silastic sheet; Nasal bone fracture

TOOLS