Comparison of postoperative pain according to the harvesting method used in hair restorative surgery

Article information

Arch Plast Surg. 2019;46(3):241-247

Publication date (electronic) : 2019 May 15

doi : https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2018.00843

Yang Seok Kim¹, Young Cheon Na¹, Jae Hyun Park^,2

¹Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea

²Dana Plastic Surgery Clinic, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence: Jae Hyun Park Dana Plastic Surgery Clinic, 606 Gangnam-daero, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06038, Korea Tel: +82-2-512-0922 Fax: +82-2-512-0942 E-mail: jay8384@naver.com

Received 2018 June 26; Revised 2019 January 22; Accepted 2019 January 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative pain can have a significant effect on patients’ recovery. A proper understanding of patients’ attitudes and concerns about postoperative pain is an essential part of postoperative patient care [1] because the anticipation of such pain is known to cause high anxiety in patients with an impending surgical procedure. Many patients with alopecia who are planning to undergo hair transplantation are also concerned about postoperative pain [2]. Information encountered on the internet or obtained from an acquaintance who has experienced extreme pain increases fear in these patients, and they may consequently decline to undergo surgery. Most hair surgeons have adopted various methods in an endeavor to lessen intraoperative pain using intravenous anesthesia, ice packing, or vibrators [3]. Bupivacaine can be applied or analgesics can be prescribed for postoperative pain [4]. However, despite such efforts, the degree of postoperative pain varies greatly from no apparent pain to excruciating pain.

To the author’s knowledge, no studies have been performed to investigate the relationship between postoperative pain and various factors such as the harvesting method (follicular unit extraction [FUE] vs. follicular unit transplantation [FUT]); number of grafts; size of surgical design; laxity, elasticity, and glidability of the scalp; and sex. Additionally, pain characteristics and duration have not been studied. Therefore, the present study was performed to investigate such details and to report the results with a review of the literature.

METHODS

This study was approved by the Internal Institutional Review Board of the Korea National Institute of Bioethics Policy (IRB No. 2015-0144-001). In total, 241 patients who underwent hair transplant surgery (202 by FUT and 39 by FUE) from June 2015 to June 2016 were eligible for the study. The operations were performed for male pattern baldness (n=129), cicatricial alopecia of the scalp (n=8), hairline correction (n=103), and pubic hair restoration (n=1).

In the FUT method, a long elliptical-shaped strip is removed from the donor area, followed by wound approximation at the margins to be closed with sutures. In the FUE method, individual follicular units are extracted after incising them with a punch 0.8–1.0 mm diameter in width.

Patients with a history of hair transplantation, laser treatment before or after surgery, eyelid surgery, rhinoplasty, filler injection, or any other type of surgery or procedures; those undergoing combined FUT and FUE surgery; and those who did not take the prescribed medication (oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or antibiotics) for various reasons such as adverse effects to drugs were excluded from the study to ensure a precise comparison.

Local anesthesia (2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine) was applied under intravenous sedation. Written informed consent for participation in the study was received from all patients prior to surgery for this prospective study. Postoperative pain assessment was performed on a daily basis.

Laxity, elasticity, and glidability of the scalp were accurately measured in all patients undergoing FUT. Laxity was measured with Dr. Parsa Mohebi Laxometer II. Elasticity was measured using Park’s method [5], in which glidability was calculated by subtracting the elasticity value from the laxity value.

After surgery, the patients were routinely prescribed oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications (aceclofenac) for 3 days.

RESULTS

Follicular unit transplantation

Correlation analysis

Pearson correlation analysis was performed to assess the associations between all relevant variables. Age was positively correlated with the number of transplanted grafts (r=0.271, P< 0.001), strip width (r=0.203, P<0.01), and strip length (r= 0.295, P<0.001) and negatively correlated with scalp laxity (r= −0.170, P<0.05). Additionally, the number of harvested grafts had a linear relationship with strip width (r=0.891, P<0.001), strip length (r=0.706, P<0.001), scalp elasticity (r=0.382, P< 0.001), and scalp glidability (r=0.402, P<0.001).

Strip width showed a positive correlation with strip length (r=0.532, P<0.001), scalp laxity (r=0.487, P<0.001), and scalp glidability (r=0.496, P<0.001). Strip length was positively correlated with scalp glidability (r=0.165, P<0.05). Scalp elasticity was positively correlated with scalp laxity (r=0.510, P<0.001) and scalp glidability (r=0.764, P<0.001).

Men tended to require larger amounts of donor hair, therefore required wider and longer donor designs. Men had higher laxity than women. Statistically significant differences in the pain score between men and women were found on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 (Table 1).

Table 1.

Difference between variables by sex

Degree of postoperative pain by day

In the pain assessment using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale, postoperative pain in those who underwent hair transplantation by the FUT method was rated at 2.03, 1.47, 0.91, 0.56, 0.36, and 0.21 points on days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7, respectively.

On the first day after transplantation, 9.5% of patients experienced extreme pain (≥4 points); this dramatically decreased to 2.0% of patients on the 2nd day and to 0.5% on the 3rd day. On the 3rd day, 91.5% of patients reported a pain score of 0 to 2, with only 8.0% of patients experiencing pain of 3 points. The postoperative pain was almost completely relieved or had disappeared by the 3rd day (Table 2).

Table 2.

Pain score by date (FUT group) (n=202)

Post hoc analysis to identify significant between-group differences showed that pain on the first day was significantly greater than pain on postoperative days 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7. Pain on postoperative day 2 was likewise significantly greater than that on days 3, 4, 5, and 7; pain on day 3 was significantly greater than that on days 4, 5, and 7; and pain on day 4 was significantly greater than that on day 7 (Table 3).

Table 3.

Difference in postoperative pain (Wong-Baker Scale) by elapsed time after FUT surgery (n=202)

Relationship between postoperative pain and various factors

The analysis of the relationship between postoperative pain and each variable showed no statistically significant relationship with age, number of grafts, width and length of surgical design for donor harvest, or laxity, elasticity, and glidability of the scalp (P>0.05). The only variable with statistical significance was sex. Postoperative pain was greater in female than male patients; the analysis showed significant differences on postoperative day 1 (t=−3.193, P<0.01), 2 (t=−3.911, P<0.001), 3 (t=−3.554, P<0.001), 4 (t=−2.951, P<0.01), and 7 (t=−2.714, P<0.01) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Postoperative pain between female and male patients

Five-point Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale: 0 point (no hurt) to 5 points (hurts worst).

Follicular unit extraction

Difference in postoperative pain (Wong-Baker Scale) after hair transplantation by FUE according to elapsed time after surgery

Patients experienced the most severe pain on postoperative day 1 with an average of 1.26 points, which decreased to 0.67, 0.31, 0.21, 0.18, and 0.13 points on days 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7, respectively.

Post hoc analysis was conducted to identify significant between-group differences, and showed that postoperative pain was significantly greater on postoperative day 1 than on days 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 and was significantly greater on day 2 than on day 7 (Table 4).

Table 4.

Difference in postoperative pain (Wong-Baker Scale) by elapsed time after FUE surgery (n=39)

Difference in postoperative pain (Wong-Baker Scale) between male and female patients according to time after surgery

The change in the degree of postoperative was not statistically significant in either male or female patients (P>0.05).

FUT versus FUE

The independent-sample t-test was used to identify differences in postoperative pain after hair transplantation between the FUT and FUE groups, and the results are shown in Table 4. A statistically significant difference was found between the two methods on days 1, 2, 3, and 4.

On postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 4, the pain scores were higher in patients who underwent FUT than in those who underwent FUE (2.03 vs. 1.26, 1.47 vs. 0.67, 0.91 vs. 0.31, and 0.56 vs. 0.21, respectively) (Table 5, Fig. 2).

Table 5.

Comparison of postoperative pain after FUT and FUE

Fig. 2.

Postoperative pain by elapsed time after surgery

Five-point Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale: 0 point (no hurt) to 5 points (hurts worst). FUE, follicular unit extraction; FUT, follicular unit transplantation.

DISCUSSION

Postoperative pain is one of the most frequent sources of anxiety and fear among patients planning to undergo not only hair transplant surgery, but indeed all types of surgical procedures [7]. Proper management of postoperative pain is essential for humanitarian needs, as well as for reducing nociception-induced responses to surgery, autonomic reflexes adversely affecting organ function, and other undesirable results [8].

One of the most common inquiries from patients during consultations is “Does it hurt?” Patients with extreme surgical fear may be hesitant to undergo hair transplantation, and those who have experienced excruciating pain may not return for subsequent sessions despite the fact that additional transplantation is necessary due to alopecia progression [2]. Therefore, proper management of pain is of great importance.

For patients who undergo hair transplantation, pain mainly occurs during and after surgery. Vibrator application, ice packing, and sedative anesthesia can be used to alleviate the pain induced during surgery. With the help of such methods, patients rarely complain of pain during surgery [9-12].

Postoperative pain following hair transplant surgery mainly arises from the donor area, rather than from the recipient area. Unlike FUE, harvesting by the FUT method involves pulling two edges of an elliptical wound to be sutured, aggravating pain due to the additional stimulus to sensory nerves caused by stretching the skin. Likewise, the FUT method is more painful than the FUE method; it also involves a linear scar, but does not require donor area shaving. In contrast, the FUE method is less painful and does not leave a linear donor scar, but it necessitates shaving the donor area. However, the non-shaven FUE method can be a satisfactory option when shaving is not acceptable. Compared to grafts harvested by FUE, the hair shafts of which measure approximately 1 mm, those harvested by the FUT method are longer, which allows the surgeon to identify hair curling. Strip harvesting is recommended for cases where identification of hair curling in the process of graft placing is crucial, such as eyebrow restoration surgery or when donor shaving is impossible. The FUE method is suitable for patients with insufficient scalp laxity for FUT or with extreme fear of postoperative pain.

In the present study, postoperative pain after FUT surgery exhibited great variety and was not significantly associated with any of the examined factors. Pain was very subjective. In the FUT group, the average pain score was 2.03, 1.47, 0.91, 0.56, 0.36, and 0.21 on postoperative day 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7, respectively. Because the degree of pain decreased to <1.0, the postoperative pain can technically be said to have disappeared within 2 days after surgery. In contrast, the pain scores in the FUE group were 1.26, 0.67, 0.31, 0.21, 0.18, and 0.13 on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found after the 2nd day, and the degree of pain on the 2nd day dropped to a value of <1.0 (i.e., 0.67).

In the comparison of the FUT and FUE methods, postoperative pain was greater in the FUT group than in the FUE group on postoperative day 1 (2.03 and 1.26 points, respectively), day 2 (1.47 and 0.67 points), day 3 (0.91 and 0.31 points), and day 4 (0.56 and 0.21 points). The pain scores were significantly higher in the FUT than FUE group from the first to fourth day postoperatively. The present study has several findings of critical clinical importance. First, postoperative pain after hair transplantation was much greater in the FUT group than in the FUE group. Therefore, patients with extreme fear of surgery can be recommended to undergo hair transplantation with the FUE method. Hair surgeons are generally aware of this phenomenon, but no previous report has objectively compared the difference in postoperative pain induced by the two methods. Therefore, the present investigation will provide hair surgeons excellent guidelines for a better understanding of pain characteristics, as well as detailed information about postoperative pain. Second, postoperative pain was almost completely resolved by the 2nd day. Thus, although pain was measurably greater after FUT surgery than after FUE surgery, the FUT method never induced excruciating pain, and the pain subsided within 2 days. Patients with an occupation that requires extreme concentration or those with anxiety and fear toward postoperative pain can receive an advance explanation that pain usually subsides by day 3. Third, postoperative pain tended to be very subjective and was not closely related to scalp laxity or the amount of donor harvest. In fact, no statistically significant relationship was found between the various factors examined and postoperative pain. Therefore, the management of postoperative pain after FUT should involve attention and care from clinicians regardless of the degree of scalp laxity. Alopecia is a progressive entity; hair loss may continue even with medication, and the existing hair may thin over time. Without proper medication adherence, the process of hair loss can be accelerated as well. Hence, a single hair transplant session is not a cure for alopecia. There is always a possibility of the need for second or third surgery sessions. Therefore, it is important for the patient to maintain a positive perception of the surgical procedure so that they do not avoid further hair transplantation because of having experienced excruciating postoperative pain. In such cases, however, harvesting by the FUE method can be an excellent option for subsequent hair transplantation.

The present report on postoperative pain provides indisputable evidence for patient education regarding the postoperative course and strong grounds for future studies on further amelioration of postoperative pain, benefitting both patients and practitioners.

Article information Continued