The Exoscope versus operating microscope in microvascular surgery: A simulation non-inferiority trial

Article information

Arch Plast Surg. 2020;47(3):242-249

Publication date (electronic) : 2020 May 15

doi : https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.01473

Georgios Pafitanis^,1,2,3, Michalis Hadjiandreou³, Alexander Alamri⁴, Christopher Uff⁴, Daniel Walsh⁵, Simon Myers^1,4

¹Group for Academic Plastic Surgery, Microvascular Anastomosis Simulation Hub, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

²Department of Plastic Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children Foundation Trust, London, UK

³Barts’ and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK

⁴Department of Neurosurgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK

⁵Department of Neurosurgery, King’s College Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence: Georgios Pafitanis Group for Academic Plastic Surgery, Microvascular Anastomosis Simulation Hub, The Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark Street, Whitechapel, London E12AT, UK Tel: +44-2078827173 Fax: +44-2078827172 E-mail: g.pafitanis@qmul.ac.uk

The authors would like to express their appreciation to Ian Weighell and Chris Fell from Synaptive Medical Inc., for their contribution in providing the Modus V device.

Received 2019 October 13; Revised 2020 March 12; Accepted 2020 April 2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In the early 1960s, the operating microscope (OM) provided magnification and illumination, and microsurgery was born [1-3]. Developments in digital imaging allowed surgeons in other areas to operate using scopes guided by a two-dimensional (2D) surgical field without magnification. Alternatives to the classical OM (Table 1) [4-8], have since anecdotally included a three-dimensional (3D) stereoscopic monitor system combined with the OM for head and neck free microvascular reconstructive procedures [9], and an exoscopic device excluding an OM in free autologous breast reconstruction [10].

Table 1.

Exoscopic devices

The term “Exoscope” is derived from the Greek words “exō” (out of) +skopeîn (to look), and it provides a high-definition image of the field from a digital camera system projected onto a 2D or 3D high-resolution monitor [11-13]. It offers high quality illumination at depth, and a broad surgical field in neuro-microvascular dissections and tumor resections [14]. One of the commonest microsurgical tasks is the microvascular anastomosis. Since there is limited experience performing microvascular anastomoses with an Exoscope [10], we have assessed whether the high-definition image, quality of magnification, and stereoscopic projection of the surgical field offer “non-inferior” value to a microsurgeon versus the standard OM.

METHODS

Simulation set-up and study design

Five expert microsurgeons, defined by performing at least one microvascular anastomosis per week, were recruited. An introductory session ensured familiarity with both the bench OM and the Exoscope, and an initial assessment of a single interrupted suture established a baseline performance for each. All the participants then completed a standardized arterial microvascular anastomosis with microsurgical instruments and 10/0 sutures (S&T AG, Neuhausen, Switzerland), using both the standard bench OM (M651/M655; Leica Microsystems, Heerbrugg, Schweiz) and the Exoscope (Modus V; Synaptive Medical Inc., 2017), on fresh ex vivo chicken ischiatic arteries (estimated average vessel external diameter of 1.7 mm) [15], and following a standardized bi-angulation technique (Fig. 1). The same approach provided a learning curve for a single expert performing consecutive anastomoses with the Exoscope until he reached plateau; where plateau was defined as two consecutive total procedure times with the Exoscope reaching the same or less than the time taken with the OM. Four electromagnetic sensors tracked each hand’s movements within a 72 cm diameter electromagnetic field to evaluate surgical dexterity: one on the dorsum of each hand across the second metacarpophalangeal joint, and one on the dorsum of each index finger middle phalanx.

Fig. 1.

Microvascular anastomosis simulation using Exoscope

(A) The sequence of microsuture in the protocol bi-angulation technique used for microvascular anastomosis. (B) Illustration of the Modus V (Synaptive Medical Inc.) operating room setup [4]. (C) 1. Exoscope, 2. High-definition (4K) screen, 3. Hand-motion analyzer electromagnetic source, 4. Microsurgical operating field and instrumentation, 5. Hand-motion analyzer sensors. (D) System status overlay display of Modus V Exoscope device with system settings appearing on video display.

RESULTS

All the experts were assessed on completing a single interrupted suture using both the OM and the Exoscope. The TP, TM, and TT were respectively 4,029 ± 1,497 (2,305, 5,358), 402 ± 45 (332, 446), and 92 ± 10 (77, 104) for the OM, and 31,775 ± 20,397 (8,504, 55,423), 1,041 ± 757 (616, 2,387), and 167 ± 21 (142, 193) for the Exoscope (Fig. 2). Students t-test analysis revealed statistical differences for TP; t = 3.03, P = 0.0162 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6,654–48,838 mm), for TM; t = 1.88, P = 0.0963 (95% CI, 143–1,421 movements), and for TT; t = 7.21, P = 0.0001 (95% CI, 51–99 seconds).

Fig. 2.

OM versus Exoscope–HMA microsuture performance

Box-plots diagrams comparison of experts’ performance for: (A) total pathlength (TP), (B) total movements (TM), (C) total time (TT) performing an interrupted microsuture on operating microscope (OM) and Exoscope (Exo). HMA, hand-motion analyzer. ^a)Statistically significant.

A total of 10 anastomoses were performed, five using the OM and five using the Exoscope. The TP, TM, and TT for the OM and the Exoscope were 72,603 ± 24,410 (45,900, 103,924), 4,436 ± 1,528 (2,840, 6,297), 931 ± 219 (620, 1,221), and 102,667 ± 18,115 (85,897, 130,973), 19,666 ± 5,493 (14,508, 25,557), 1,645 ± 388 (1,225, 2,156) respectively (Fig. 3). Students t-test analysis revealed statistical differences for TP; t = 2.21, P = 0.0579 (95% CI, 1,284–61,412), for TM; t = 5.97, P = 0.0003 (95% CI, 9,351–21,110), and for TT; t = 3.59, P = 0.0072 (95% CI, 254–1,173). All anastomoses were evaluated for the quality of the intimal suturing, and achieved a global mean ALI score of 9.3 ± 0.7 (8, 10); for the Exoscope and 9.6 ± 0.5 (9, 10) for the OM.

Fig. 3.

OM versus Exoscope–HMA anastomosis performance

Box-plots diagrams comparison of experts’ performance for: (A) total pathlength (TP), (B) total movements (TM), (C) total time (TT) performing microvascular anastomoses with the operating microscope (OM) and Exoscope (Exo). HMA, hand-motion analyzer. ^a)Statistically significant.

A 51%, 58%, and 46% improvement or reduction in TT, TM, TP, respectively, during the microvascular anastomosis learning curve and reaching plateau after nine consecutive repetitions (Fig. 4). Raw inferiority in demonstrated in OSP (Fig. 5), however, clinical non-inferiority is established with inferiority margin (Δ) of 10 minutes and an absolute difference of 0.07 minutes between OM and Exoscope cohorts (Fig. 6).

Fig. 4.

Exoscope microvascular anastomosis learning curve

Performance after nine repetitions versus the operating microscope (OM) performance in total pathlength (TP), total time (TT), and total movements (TM) (red lines).

Fig. 5.

Overall surgical performance indicators

Radar chart demonstrating overall surgical performance indicators for operating microscope (OM) and Exoscope.

Fig. 6.

Non-inferiority outcomes OM versus Exoscope

Clinical inferiority of the use of the Exoscope versus the operating microscope (OM) in microvascular anastomosis is demonstrated with total time margin of equivalence of 10 minutes.

DISCUSSION

The Exoscope is a novel device offering surgical field magnification and illumination with a high-definition 2D or 3D screen image, that presents an alternative to the OM [11]. Current literature demonstrates promise in neurosurgery [14]. The Exoscope appears at least equivalent to the OM in terms of image quality, magnification, and illumination, and offers high-resolution, precise focusing, and a broad depth of field [19,20]. Indeed, the Exoscope may prove superior to the OM in terms of image quality when connected to an ultra-high-definition monitor, although these advanced technical modifications could arguably be attached to any conventional OM [21]. This non-inferiority simulation study investigated the Exoscope versus the standard OM in the ex vivo high-fidelity microsurgical task of microvascular anastomosis, a core microsurgical skill.

This study demonstrated non-inferiority of the Exoscope versus the standard OM in the validated objective electromagnetic hand-motion analysis parameters TP, TM, and TT in a cohort of experts that had no prior exposure to the Exoscope. The learning curve reflected the differences in technique required to adjust from a stereoscopic OM to 2D exoscopic system, i.e., a combination of lack of stereopsis, improved image quality and magnification. We further explored and tracked the learning curve to demonstrate the “warm up” required to reach equality in the composite OSP indicator; and defined some constructive technical adjustments that may prove important in exoscopic stereo-3D to 2D microsurgery practice [22].

Quantitative analysis of the experts’ performances demonstrated that on average 28 m more surgical pathlength and 1.25 minutes more time were required to complete the initial single interrupted suture; and 30 m more surgical pathlength and 12 minutes more time to complete each anastomosis with the Exoscope, compared to the OM. These outcomes demonstrate objectively the challenging transition from traditional stereoscopic surgical vision versus stereo-3D to 2D screen, with a virtual digital depth perception, especially during the first attempt of the single interrupted suture. Overall, surgical performance executing the single interrupted microsuturing and microvascular endto-end anastomosis was relatively poor; but, the absolute differences in surgical pathlength and surgical time narrowed substantially and incrementally with each further suture while using novel exoscopic device. Clinically, the difference of 12 minutes in performing an arterial microvascular anastomosis in reconstructive surgery is understood to be expected to have low impact on the overall cost-efficiency of the totality of the free tissue transfer procedure [17]. Our findings, objectively support other studies reporting expert neurosurgeons using the Exoscope safely and successfully at first exposure in advanced surgical tasks [10-14,20].

The improvement in learning curve parameters, could potentially provide an early proof that Exoscope microvascular anastomosis, when performed by experts, has no negative clinical impact to the operative time (Fig. 4). These findings reinforce that a “warm up” training session can provide the surgeon with the adequate experience to overcome the technical difficulties entailing exoscopic microsurgery. Qualitative video-analysis of the anastomoses under the OM demonstrated bi-dexterity and fluent high-fidelity microsuturing with efficiency, agility and precision in surgical performance, whilst, the same analysis for the exoscopic performance showed adjustments in the experts’ technique that facilitated safety, digital depth perception or the “see-field-feel-see” perception of surgical field.

The Exoscope appears to be safe and effective when used by an expert microsurgeon (Figs. 5, 6), and potentially offers improved ergonomics, image quality, and accessibility to the surgical field. The Exoscope has the potential to be integrated with other novel technological advancements, such as; augmented reality enhanced microsurgery and robotic-assisted microsurgery, as robotic devices that are under development require the use of a microscope to facilitate clinical performance [23]. The lack of stereopsis is its main drawback of similar video telescope operating monitor (VITOM) devices such as the endoscopicassisted microsurgery, as reported in other microsurgical subspecialties [4,5,18,19,24]. This can be overcome by using more than one 4K sensors to provide a stereoscopic 3D image [25]. We visualize the future of microsurgery with advanced roboticassisted devices that synchronize in real time, while the robotic exoscopic arm follows seamlessly the micro-operative field while adjusting magnification, focus and illumination for optimal visualization. Furthermore, the motion tracking adjunct capabilities provide an easy video enhanced educational platform that could be used as a tele-medicine or tele-education platform to enhance the potentials of microsurgical education.

This study included only a limited number of participants and procedure repetitions, however, it fulfils the primary rationale and explored further the learning curve of operating advanced microvascular task stereo-3D to 2D screen. It also exploited the technical challenges of the lack of surgical depth and the shift from vertical to horizontal surgical orientation, which were easily manipulated by experienced surgeon to lead in safe practice with the burden of longer operating time. Further studies are required to fully characterize the learning curve and challenges of exoscopic microsurgery, while establish the level of competency and transferrable skills from OM to Exoscope operating in different clinical tasks, such as: microsurgical resections or dissections, perivascular pedicle dissection and flap elevation and microvascular advanced vessels anastomosis.

The Modus V when used with heads-up 2D stereopsis does not cause motion sickness or nausea; on the other hand, it provides an ergonomic approach to quality microsurgical operating. When the 3D glasses are used that enable 3D heads-up stereoscopic visualization; motion sickness could be claimed to be caused by excessive movements, rapid changes of the field or prolonged usage. In this study motion sickness was not observed as, in our experience during microvascular anastomosis, the field is stable, the robotic arm is used in a fixed position and the operating time is limited to approximately less than 30 minutes.

The Exoscope non-inferiority in regards to the microvascular anastomosis has been clearly investigated using objective measures (operative time, surgical efficiency/hand-motion analysis parameters) and the safety of each modality that offers magnifications (OM vs. Exoscope) has been established. Currently, initial clinical experience of this device has been demonstrated in neuro-microsurgical dissection and recent report demonstrated its applicability in flap raising and microvascular pedicle dissection including the microvascular anastomosis in free tissue transfers [10,11]. The VITOM technology in microvascular surgery (anastomosis), detailed the clear benefits from its innovative design, illumination and the safety of its application, including technical considerations, especially in 3D stereoscopic visualization. This study demonstrated the short learning curve in exoscopic microvascular end-to-end anastomosis, and further allows confidence and safety of the use of Exoscope in clinical environment in such a technically demanding surgical task. We believe that novel technologies that change the common practice, should be initially attempted in a safe simulation environment to allow clinical safety which cannot be universally guaranteed even in the hands of expert microsurgeons, as this may prevent errors or operating delays as a burden of its novelty.

This study demonstrated that experts’ microvascular anastomosis with the Exoscope appears non-inferior to the OM. Exoscopic microvascular anastomosis was time consuming, however, the quality of the end-product (patency) was not inferior. The experts’ “warm-up” learning curve is steep but swift and may prove to reach clinical equality. The expanded use of the Exoscope as an alternative to OM, in other advanced microsurgical tasks such as, perivascular, pedicle or flap dissection is yet to be objectively defined and further pre-clinical studies are required to establish its clinical efficacy and safety.

Article information Continued