Single-port robot-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction with the da Vinci SP Surgical System: first clinical report

Article information

Arch Plast Surg. 2021;48(2):194-198

Publication date (electronic) : 2021 March 15

doi : https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2020.01557

Oh Young Joo¹, Seung Yong Song^,1, Hyung Seok Park², Tai Suk Roh¹

¹Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

²Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence: Seung Yong Song Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Korea Tel: +82-2-2228-2214 Fax: +82-2-393-6947 E-mail: pssysong@yuhs.ac

Received 2020 July 29; Revised 2020 December 30; Accepted 2020 December 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

With its three-dimensional imaging system and flexible robotic arms and instruments, robotic surgery is being carried out in many different fields of surgeries [1,2]. Through a very small axillary wound, the da Vinci surgical platform is introduced to perform robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy (R-NSM) [3], with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). This surgical technique is reported to have shown promising surgical and cosmetic outcomes [4,5].

The recently released da Vinci SP Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) is a true single-port platform with all the instruments entering into one single port [6]. The newly improved single-port design offers three fully articulating 6-mm instruments, as opposed to rigid instrument arms of current robotic systems. Instead of each instrument approaching the surgical site from a different trajectory, the da Vinci SP instruments all pass through a single 25-mm cannula port and individually articulate within the surgical field [7].

We present two patients who underwent R-NSM and IBR with satisfactory results. To our knowledge, these cases are the first breast reconstruction cases using the da Vinci SP Surgical System.

CASES

Two patients were referred to our breast cancer clinic for breast cancer. Based on the patients’ breast size and their will to reduce surgical scars, we proposed R-NSM and IBR.

Nipple-sparing mastectomy along with sentinel lymph node biopsy were performed by a single oncologic surgeon (HSP) using the da Vinci SP Surgical System through a longitudinal skin incision in the mid-axillary line. The lengths of the incisions were 4.7 cm (right side), 3.7 cm (left side) for one patient and 2.5 cm for the other patient. The lengths of the incisions were not homogenous because these cases were initial trials. After some experience, the incision length is getting shorter and shorter. Additional incisions (resulting length was 5 cm for both patients) had to be made by the plastic surgeon (SYS) for the insertion of breast implant or tissue expander. The breast tissue was detached and removed through the same axillary incision. After mastectomy, the EndoWrist instruments (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) were sterilized for re-use during the reconstruction procedure. The resulting scars were not able to be seen in frontal view and was hidden by the patient’s arm in lateral view (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Incision on axilla. Four centimeters incision on axilla is noted. Robot-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed by our institute’s oncologic surgeon.

Case 1

The first patient desired one-staged breast reconstruction, thus we planned for prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. A 16×16-cm sized sheet of acellular dermal matrix (ADM; MegaDerm, L&C BIO, Seongnam, Korea) was sewn to provide total coverage of the prosthesis (Fig. 2). After preparation of a prepectoral pocket which was measured and designed based on the diameter of the desired implant, two 200-mL negative drainage systems were inserted, then irrigation with saline containing antibiotics was done. Then, the ADM-covered implant was inserted to the prepectoral pocket with the assist of a funnel (Art funnel, Art Meditech, Seoul, Korea) (Fig. 3). After insertion, ADM was sutured manually to the upper and lateral side of pectoralis major muscle. Robotic arms were not used in this case.

Fig. 2.

ADM coverage for prepectoral DTI reconstruction. (A) Anteroposterior view. (B) Posteroanterior view. One sheet of ADM was designed and sewn to fully cover the implant. ADM, acellular dermal matrix; DTI, direct-to-implant.

Fig. 3.

ADM-wrapped implant insertion through funnel kit. ADM, acellular dermal matrix.

During the procedure we have checked the blood circulation in the mastectomy flap as well as the position of inframammary fold (IMF). In this case, the IMF line was well preserved during mastectomy. The burn wounds seen in Fig. 1 were caused unintentionally during mastectomy and were carefully managed by our plastic surgery team. We carefully applied brassiere to maintain proper position of implant and to the extent that it does not interfere with perfusion of the mastectomy flap.

Case 2

The second patient wanted augmented breasts and thus we recommended two-staged breast reconstruction with tissue expander insertion. Since we think that implant insertions into the same plane for both breasts would be more comfortable to the patient, subpectoral tissue expander insertion was decided. Possibility of rippling and muscle action were also considered in this decision. After the same mastectomy procedure mentioned above, the pectoralis major muscle was elevated under direct vision, from the lateral border to the nipple level with caution. Further dissection to the inferomedial origin of the pectoralis major muscle had to be performed using the robotic system due to the interference of the chest wall curvature. During this procedure, a 6-mm Maryland Bipolar Forceps EndoWrist instrument (Intuitive Surgical Inc.) and a 6-mm Monopolar Permanent Cautery Spatula EndoWrist instrument were used for traction/counter-traction and dissection, respectively. Then with the right robotic arm, the ADM was sutured to the inframammary fold to create an ADM sling with Vicryl interrupted sutures using a Mega Suture Cut Needle Driver (Intuitive Surgical Inc.) (Fig. 4). After preparing the subpectoral pocket, two 200-mL negative drainage systems were inserted, and irrigation with saline containing antibiotics was done. An expander was inserted into the subpectoral pocket, as the ADM sling serving as a supportive structure inferiorly. Intraoperatively, the expander was inflated with saline, considering skin tension. After suturing the ADM to the muscle, the operation was finished.

Fig. 4.

Acellular dermal matrix sling fixation.

No conversion to open surgery, hematoma, total nipple or skin necrosis occurred. The first patient (case 1) experienced mild infection on a single breast, which resolved with intravenous antibiotic treatment without the need for implant removal. The second patient (case 2) did not experience any major/minor complications. In case of the operation time for breast reconstruction, the bilateral direct-to-implant case took about 4 hours while the expander insertion case took about 2 hours.

The second patient (case 2) has not undergone second-stage reconstruction at the time of publication. Preoperative and postoperative clinical photographs of the patients are shown in Figs. 5 and 6. Both patients were satisfied with their results, especially with the unnoticeable scars (Fig. 7).

Fig. 5.

Preoperative and postoperative frontal views (case 1). Preoperative and at 1 month postoperative.

Fig. 6.

Preoperative and postoperative frontal views (case 2). Preoperative and at 1 month postoperative, with 460 cc inflated tissue expander.

Fig. 7.

Postoperative scar after 1 year.

DISCUSSION

Compared to other cancer-diagnosed patients, patients with early breast cancer are more interested in postoperative cosmetic results. This seems obvious regarding the improved disease-free period and overall survival rates. With regard to aesthetic outcomes, R-NSM with IBR could be a new surgical method that ensures oncologic safety. Previous studies have shown that this method could be safe and feasible [4,8].

Among the several advantages of the robotic approach are subtle manipulation, seven degrees of freedom of motion (including in/out, rotation, pitch/yaw at wrist, pitch/yaw at fulcrum, and grip strength), and being comparatively simple to learn [9]. However, there are some technical difficulties regarding the inadequate working space with bulky robot instruments.

The surgeon could experience familiarity using the new SP platform since it shares multiple features with prior multiport da Vinci platforms (S, Si, and Xi models). It uses the same operative interface, including EndoWrist manipulators, high-definition three-dimensional visualization with magnification and scaled movement, and tremor reduction. Moreover, the incision length of mastectomy using da Vinci SP can be reduced to 2.5 cm. However, to introduce an ADM-wrapped implant such as in our first case, we think at least 4 cm of incision is inevitable for use of around 300 cc implant. In our institution we use 16×16 cm sized ADM for wrapping, and it is impossible to fully wrap big sized prosthesis. In such cases when bigger implants must be used, it is important not only to make sure that the ADM does not get denuded during the insertion process but also to consider longer incisions if needed.

Of course, several technical advances have been made which enable the use of multiple robotic instruments through a single incision [10]. In these two cases, the smaller diameter of the da Vinci SP robot arms (6 mm) compared to other robotic systems(8 mm) made procedures such as pectoralis major muscle elevation and ADM suture easier and more convenient. Especially, the da Vinci SP platform’s novel modifications from previous models such as flexible camera, articulating instruments, and navigator guidance for real-time monitoring of instrument position allowed continuous adjustment and readjustment of the visual perspective. In the author’s opinion, this surgical platform is the most appropriate device for carrying out mastectomy and breast reconstruction through a small sized single incision.

Prepectoral breast reconstruction is a modern concept that was reported to have not only promising cosmetic results but also decreased muscular dissection and related injuries [11]. This case has shown that both subpectoral/prepectoral breast reconstruction using the da Vinci SP Surgical Platform could be safe and feasible. To our knowledge, this study is the first to describe a clinical series using or not using the da Vinci SP robotic platform to perform da Vinci SP assisted NSM with IBR.

Article information Continued