Late-Onset Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection after Facial Poly-L-Lactic Acid Injection

Article information

Arch Plast Surg. 2017;44(3):248-249
Publication date (electronic) : 2017 May 22
doi : https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.248
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea.
Correspondence: Ji Seon Cheon. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine, 309 Pilmun-daero, Dong-gu, Gwangju 61452, Korea. Tel: +82-62-220-3180, Fax: +82-62-225-0996, ps9107@naver.com
Received 2016 December 07; Revised 2017 February 16; Accepted 2017 March 04.

Poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) is widely used in lipoatrophy and facial rejuvenation for its ability to stimulate collagen neogenesis. Although its safety and efficacy have been established, adverse effects have been reported [12]. Late-onset adverse effects, occurring 6 months or more after injection, include granulomas, nodules, and pseudoabscess [1].

A 43-year-old woman presented with painful erythematous nodules on the left temple (Fig. 1), where PLLA had been injected for augmentation 14 months previously. She had no predisposing factors, and empirical antibiotic treatment did not lead to improvement. After incision of the nodules, pus and tissue materials were drained (Fig. 2), Histopathologic findings showed an abscess without granulomatous features around foreign body materials (Fig. 3), and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was cultured. We therefore made the diagnosis of late-onset MRSA infection after PLLA injection.

Fig. 1

Several painful erythematous nodules (red arrowhead) on the left temporal area of the patient's face.

Fig. 2

After incision of the nodule, material including pus and tissue was drained.

Fig. 3

Skin biopsy revealing numerous inflammatory cells with fragments of foreign materials (H&E, × 200; neutrophil infiltration [red arrowhead], foreign body [blue arrow]).

In this case, the subcutaneous nodules showed no sign of a granulomatous reaction, and MRSA was grown in a bacterial culture. Bacterial contamination of the filler materials may have been the cause of these nodules, which is related to the biofilm theory. Biofilms, defined as communities of microorganisms, are attached to the inert surfaces of catheters, and Staphylococcus aureus is frequently found in a dormant state within biofilms. It can be reactivated by external triggering factors (e.g., trauma), causing low-grade infection and abscess [3]. Our patient had not undergone any additional procedures, but repetitive traumas in daily life may have served as the triggering factor. Intravenous vancomycin was administered accordingly, and the nodules recovered completely without scarring. Therefore, physicians who perform aesthetic procedures should be aware that late-onset painful nodules are likely to be caused by a bacterial infection such as MRSA, and identification of the bacteria may be preferable to hastily pursuing other treatment possibilities.

Notes

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Alijotas-Reig J, Garcia-Gimenez V, Vilardell-Tarres M. Late-onset immune-mediated adverse effects after poly-L-lactic acid injection in non-HIV patients: clinical findings and long-term follow-up. Dermatology 2009;219:303–308. 19797889.
2. Choi WY, Cho HW, Lee DW. Complications of injectable soft tissue filler. Arch Aesthetic Plast Surg 2015;21:1–6.
3. Sadashivaiah AB, Mysore V. Biofilms: their role in dermal fillers. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2010;3:20–22. 20606988.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Several painful erythematous nodules (red arrowhead) on the left temporal area of the patient's face.

Fig. 2

After incision of the nodule, material including pus and tissue was drained.

Fig. 3

Skin biopsy revealing numerous inflammatory cells with fragments of foreign materials (H&E, × 200; neutrophil infiltration [red arrowhead], foreign body [blue arrow]).