Polydeoxyribonucleotide Improves Peripheral Tissue Oxygenation and Accelerates Angiogenesis in Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Article information

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic foot ulcers are a common condition, characterized by chronic ulceration with vascular complications that impede the normal wound healing process [1]. Diabetic foot ulcers are the most common foot injuries leading to foot pain and poor quality of life due to lower extremity amputation. In diabetics, the combined effects of peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, and infection aggravate ulceration, potentially leading to amputation. Peripheral arterial insufficiency with neuropathy has associated with a 10-fold increase in the risk of ulceration progressing to infection, gangrene, and amputation [2]. Consequently, diabetic foot ulcers are one of the most challenging conditions for plastic surgeons to treat.

Polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) is obtained from sperm of trout by an extraction process in which purification and high-temperature sterilization procedures are performed to obtain an >95% pure active product. This compound is low-molecular-weight DNA containing a mixture of deoxyribonucleotide polymers with chain lengths ranging between 50 and 2000 base pairs. In vitro, PDRN has been shown to enhance the growth rate of human fibroblasts and osteoblasts in primary cultures at therapeutic concentrations [3,4]. In vivo, PDRN has been shown to enhance wound healing in an experimental model of thermal injury, in diabetic mice, and in ischemic skin flaps [5-7]. In addition, PDRN enhanced angiogenesis and neovascularization in a model of peripheral artery occlusive disease [8]. The cell proliferation effect appears to be mediated by the activation of purinergic adenosine A2A receptor [4].

The use of PDRN in reconstructive surgery is steadily becoming more popular, as evidence of the regenerative and reparative effects of PDRN becomes better known. The aim of this study was to investigate whether PDRN could improve peripheral tissue oxygenation and angiogenesis in diabetic foot ulcers.

METHODS

This was prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. All patients provided written informed consent before being enrolled. The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Keimyung University in Korea (DSMC-02-011).

Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly chosen to receive a placebo (n=10) or PDRN (n=10). To estimate the number of patients that would be needed, we adapted the protocol of a publication that was similar to our experimental protocol [9]. Based on the results of that study, we calculated the sample size for a power of 80% and a significance level of 0.05, supposing that the study would be effective. Based on this calculation, 10 patients were included in each group.

Experimental protocol

Initial surgical debridement of the necrotic tissue was performed under spinal or local anesthesia. After the initial surgical debridement, PDRN was administered for 2 weeks by daily intramuscular administration for 5 days per week (1 ampule, 3 mL, 5.625 mg) and through the perilesional route for 2 days per week (1 ampule, 3 mL, 5.625 mg). The PDRN vials (Rejuvenex; Pharma Research Product, Gangneung, Korea) contained 5.625 mg of the substance in 3 mL as the active ingredient. Perilesional administration was performed by an experienced physician in the hospital setting using a 30-G needle insulin syringe. Intramuscular injections of PDRN were performed on the buttock (gluteus maximus muscle) on the side of the wound. Perilesional injections of PDRN were made around the debrided wound in the intradermal layer. If a wound was too small for 3 mL of PDRN to be injected, the remaining PDRN was injected extensively around the wound to prevent complications of injection, such as vessel compromise. The patients were evaluated before the injections, and then on days 1, 3, 7, and 14 of the injections. After 2 weeks of PDRN administration, surgical procedures (debridement and primary closure, debridement and a local flap, or debridement and a split-thickness skin graft) were performed to cover the ulcerative lesions. Finally, 2 weeks after the coverage operation, the patients were evaluated. The control group was evaluated after the administration of 3 mL of 0.9% normal saline (Fig. 1) [10,11].

Fig. 1.

Treatment protocol of the study

PDRN, polydeoxyribonucleotide; IM, intramuscular; TcPO₂, transcutaneous oxygen tension.

Transcutaneous oxygen tension measurements

TcPO₂ (mm Hg) was recorded using a Periflux System 5000 with the TcPO₂/CO₂ unit 5040 (Fig. 2). This study was performed in a room where the temperature was maintained at 22–24°C. The sensor of TcPO₂ contacts the patient’s skin with adhesive rings and contact liquid. The transducer of the probe was heated to 44°C. The transcutaneous tissue oxygen level was measured after it reached a steady plateau state, on the same angiosome just proximal to the ulcerative lesion (Fig. 3). Transcutaneous tissue oxygen levels were evaluated before the injections and on days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28.

Fig. 2.

Periflux System 5000

Fig. 3.

Measurements of transcutaneous tissue oxygen levels

Transcutaneous tissue oxygen levels were measured on the same angiosome, just proximal to the ulcerative lesion. (A) Control group, day 7. (B) PDRN-treated group, day 28. PDRN, polydeoxyribonucleotide.

RESULTS

Of the 30 patients who were screened, 10 were excluded: 3 refused to participate, 3 patients were excluded due to concurrent corticosteroid use, and 4 patients were excluded because of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. A total of 20 patients were enrolled in the study: 10 in the control group and 10 in the PDRN group (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Flow chart of the study

PDRN, polydeoxyribonucleotide.

In the control group, the mean age was 62±11.3 years (range, 43–78 years) and the duration of the wound before evaluation was 1.2±0.8 months (range, 0.3–3.0 months). The wound size after initial debridement averaged 5.7±3.7 cm² (range, 1.0–14.5 cm²) and the average ankle-brachial index was 1.04±0.14 (range, 0.84–1.26). In the PDRN-treated group, the mean age was 64±12.2 years (range, 44–82 years) and the mean duration of the wound before medical treatment was 1.1±0.72 months (range, 0.2–2.5 months). The wound size after initial debridement averaged 5.9±3.8 cm² (range, 1.5–13.5 cm²), and the average ankle-brachial index was 1.07±0.13 (range, 0.88–1.31) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the treatment and control groups

PDRN increased peripheral tissue oxygenation

The control group had relative TcPO₂ values (the TcPO₂ value on the measured day divided by the initial TcPO₂ value) of 0.97 on day 1, 0.99 on day 3, 1.01 on day 7, 1.00 on day 14, and 1.046 on day 28. The PDRN group had relative TcPO₂ values of 0.97 on day 1, 1.04 on day 3, 1.19 on day 7, 1.30 on day 14, and 1.30 on day 28. No statistically significant difference was observed between the groups on day 1 (P>0.05) and day 3 (P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the PDRN-treated group showed a statistically significant difference on day 7 (P<0.01), day 14 (P<0.001), and day 28 (P<0.001) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.

TcPO₂ results

No statistically significant difference was found on days 1 or 3. The PDRN-treated group showed statistically significant differences on days 7, 14, and 28. All data are expressed as mean±standard deviation. Relative value (the TcPO₂ value on the measured day divided by the initial TcPO₂ value). PDRN, polydeoxyribonucleotide; TcPO₂, transcutaneous oxygen tension. ^**P<0.01; ^***P<0.001.

PDRN improved inflammation, increased granulation tissue formation, and increased angiogenesis

In the histologic evaluation, inflammation in the PDRN group showed improvements compared to the control group. In the control group, acute and chronic inflammation persisted with neutrophil pigmentation. However, the PDRN-treated group exhibited less neutrophil pigmentation than the control group. The vessel density (average number of vessels per visual field) in the control group was 2.56±0.42 (range, 1.9–3.1) before treatment and 2.78±0.47 (range, 1.9–3.5) after 2 weeks of 0.9% normal saline injections. The vessel density in the PDRN group was 2.72±0.48 (range, 2.1–3.7) before treatment and 3.28± 0.87 (range, 2.0–4.6) after 2 weeks of PDRN injections. Compared to the control group, the PDRN-treated group showed increased granulation tissue formation with higher-density vascular markings (Figs. 6, 7). However, this relationship failed to reach statistical significance (P=0.094) (Fig. 8).

Fig. 6.

Histologic evaluation of the control group

(A) Pre-treatment (H&E, ×40); necrosis with neutrophil pigmentation. (B) Post-treatment (H&E, ×40); persistent acute and chronic inflammation. (C) Pretreatment (H&E, ×200); inflammation with necrosis. (D) Post-treatment (H&E, ×200); vascular marking (yellow arrows) with granulation tissue formation.

Fig. 7.

Histologic evaluation of the PDRN-treated group

(A) Pre-treatment (H&E, ×40); central ulcer with necrosis, pigmented neutrophils (ellipse). (B) Post-treatment (H&E, ×40); inflammation improved. (C) Pre-treatment (H&E, ×200), (D) Post-treatment (H&E, ×200); vascular proliferation (yellow arrows) with granulation tissue formation. H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; PDRN, polydeoxyribonucleotide.

Fig. 8.

Vessel density

No statistically significant difference was found between the control group and the PDRN group in vessel density (average number of vessels per visual field) (P=0.094). All data are expressed as mean±standard deviation. PDRN, polydeoxyribonucleotide.

DISCUSSION

In this study, PDRN was successfully used to improve peripheral tissue oxygenation and angiogenesis. PDRN also improved inflammation.

Diabetic foot ulcers are difficult to deal with due to the combined effects of peripheral neuropathy, peripheral vascular disease, and infection. Although diabetic foot ulcers are managed with various types of surgical procedures, there is no definitive therapeutic drug intervention that can accelerate the healing of diabetic foot ulcers. Considerable research into the effects of PDRN has been conducted in a diverse range of clinical fields. PDRN is the active fraction of a preparation used in therapy as a tissue repair and stimulating agent, and is extracted from the sperm of trout bred for human consumption [14]. In previous studies, PDRN accelerated wound healing in diabetic mice [5]. In other studies, PDRN improved blood flow in peripheral artery occlusive disease in rats [8]. In addition, PDRN stimulated corneal epithelium regeneration after photorefractive keratectomy [15]. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial found that PDRN exerted favorable effects on the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers [11]. In previous studies, insufficient data were reported about the effects of PDRN on peripheral tissue oxygenation and about the pathologic features associated with PDRN treatment, especially in diabetic foot ulcers. The authors monitored peripheral tissue oxygenation with the Periflux System 5000 (using the TcPO₂/CO₂ unit 5040) and observed that PDRN improved peripheral tissue oxygenation. In this study, peripheral tissue oxygenation (TcPO₂) in the PDRN-treated group was significantly higher on day 7 (P< 0.01), day 14 (P<0.001), and day 28 (P<0.001). Additionally, more vessel proliferation was found in the PDRN-treated group. Based on these results, PDRN seems to activate vascular proliferation, thereby increasing peripheral tissue oxygenation.

The angiogenesis cascade has not been fully elucidated due to its high degree of complexity. However, angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and transforming growth factor beta have been shown to increase angiogenesis effectively [16,17]. Extracellular adenosine actions are mediated by the activation of 4 distinct G protein-coupled cell surface receptors (A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃) [18]. PDRN stimulates adenosine A_2A receptors under pathological conditions of low tissue perfusion [14]. PDRN exerts angiogenic effects via VEGF augmentation [8]. To assess the angiogenic effect of PDRN, we conducted a quantitative histologic assessment of the microvasculature. Although the PDRN treatment group demonstrated a mild increase in the vessel count, this trend was not statistically significant. Although we did not obtain significant results in the histologic analysis, the augmentation of tissue oxygenation was also an important result, with implications for angiogenesis. To clarify the exact effects of PDRN on diabetic foot ulcers, further experiments with a larger number of patients are necessary.

Our study had some limitations, such as an insufficient number of enrolled patients. Moreover, the short follow-up period was a limitation. Further, the absence of an immunohistochemical analysis in the present study prevented us from accurately evaluating wound regeneration on the molecular level. In the next phase of the study, immunohistochemical studies will be included in order to examine the effects of PDRN. Additionally, in the present study, changes in the wound surface area after PDRN injection were not evaluated. In another study, PDRN had favorable effects on the healing of diabetic foot ulcers with conservative dressing [11]. Although our study focused on the effects of PDRN in a treatment plan that included surgical management, an assessment of wound size alteration would have been desirable. Further studies are necessary.

In this study, we found that PDRN improved peripheral tissue oxygenation and angiogenesis. Additionally, PDRN had a positive effect on inflammation in diabetic foot ulcers. This study suggests that PDRN may be an effective and safe treatment option for diabetic foot ulcers, in addition to the standard treatments that are currently available.

Article information Continued