1. Atiyeh BS, Al-Amm CA, Nasser AA. Improved healing of split thickness skin graft donor sites. J Appl Res 2002;2:114–121.
3. Dornseifer U, Lonic D, Gerstung TI, et al. The ideal split-thickness skin graft donor-site dressing: a clinical comparative trial of a modified polyurethane dressing and aquacel. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;128:918–924. PMID:
21681125.
4. O'Donoghue JM, O'Sullivan ST, Beausang ES, et al. Calcium alginate dressings promote healing of split skin graft donor sites. Acta Chir Plast 1997;39:53–55. PMID:
9294907.
5. Vaingankar NV, Sylaidis P, Eagling V, et al. Comparison of hydrocellular foam and calcium alginate in the healing and comfort of split-thickness skin-graft donor sites. J Wound Care 2001;10:289–291. PMID:
12964350.
6. Bettinger D, Gore D, Humphries Y. Evaluation of calcium alginate for skin graft donor sites. J Burn Care Rehabil 1995;16:59–61. PMID:
7721911.
7. Giele H, Tong A, Huddleston S. Adhesive retention dressings are more comfortable than alginate dressings on split skin graft donor sites--a randomised controlled trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2001;83:431–434. PMID:
11777142.
8. Hormbrey E, Pandya A, Giele H. Adhesive retention dressings are more comfortable than alginate dressings on split-skin-graft donor sites. Br J Plast Surg 2003;56:498–503. PMID:
12890465.
9. Chuenkongkaew T. Modification of split-thickness skin graft: cosmetic donor site and better recipient site. Ann Plast Surg 2003;50:212–214. PMID:
12567064.
10. Weyandt GH, Bauer B, Berens N, et al. Split-skin grafting from the scalp: the hidden advantage. Dermatol Surg 2009;35:1873–1879. PMID:
19681998.
11. Khalid K, Tarar MN, Mahmood F, et al. Scalp as a donor site for split thickness skin grafts. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2008;20:66–69. PMID:
19024190.
12. Robert N, May P, Binder JP, et al. The scalp as a donor site for split-thickness skin graft: a rare complication case report. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011;64:e118–e120. PMID:
21300581.
13. Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature 1962;193:293–294. PMID:
14007593.
14. Jensen EB, Gundersen HJ, Osterby R. Determination of membrane thickness distribution from orthogonal intercepts. J Microsc 1979;115:19–33. PMID:
423237.
15. Ostrovskiy NV. Selection of the skin graft thickness with regard to structure of the donor site skin. Acta Chir Plast 1985;27:145–151. PMID:
3904289.
16. Fox CH, Johnson FB, Whiting J, et al. Formaldehyde fixation. J Histochem Cytochem 1985;33:845–853. PMID:
3894502.
17. Cutts A. Shrinkage of muscle fibres during the fixation of cadaveric tissue. J Anat 1988;160:75–78. PMID:
3253263.
18. Hudson-Peacock MJ, Matthews JN, Lawrence CM. Relation between size of skin excision, wound, and specimen. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995;32:1010–1015. PMID:
7751445.
19. Golomb FM, Doyle JP, Grin CM, et al. Determination of preexcision surgical margins of melanomas from fixed-tissue specimens. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;88:804–809. PMID:
1924566.
20. Gregory N, Mulvaney M, Pattison T, et al. Shrinkage of skin excision specimens and downcoding. Arch Dermatol 2003;139:542–543. PMID:
12707111.
21. Kerns MJ, Darst MA, Olsen TG, et al. Shrinkage of cutaneous specimens: formalin or other factors involved? J Cutan Pathol 2008;35:1093–1096. PMID:
18544064.
22. Dauendorffer JN, Bastuji-Garin S, Guero S, et al. Shrinkage of skin excision specimens: formalin fixation is not the culprit. Br J Dermatol 2009;160:810–814. PMID:
19183182.
23. Garcia E, Stone E, Chan LS, et al. Donor-site preferences in women during autologous skin grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;133:378e–382e.
24. White N, Hettiaratchy S, Papini RP. The choice of split-thickness skin graft donor site: patients' and surgeons' preferences. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:933–934. PMID:
12960897.
25. Greenhalgh DG, Barthel PP, Warden GD. Comparison of back versus thigh donor sites in pediatric patients with burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 1993;14:21–25. PMID:
8454661.