5. Adams WP Jr, Small KH. The process of breast augmentation with special focus on patient education, patient selection and implant selection. Clin Plast Surg 2015;42:413–26.
8. Schwartz MR. Algorithm and techniques for using Sientra’s silicone gel shaped implants in primary and revision breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134(1 Suppl):18S–27S.
10. Randquist C, Gribbe O. Highly cohesive textured form stable gel implants: principles and technique. In: Hall-Findlay EJ, Evans GR, Kim KK editors. Aesthetic and reconstructive surgery of the breast. New York: Saunders Elsevier; 2010. p.339–55.
11. Atiyeh BS, Dibo SA, Nader M, et al. Preoperative assessment tool for the planning of inframammary incision and implant profile in breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2014;38:878–86.
12. Pusic AL, Reavey PL, Klassen AF, et al. Measuring patient outcomes in breast augmentation: introducing the BREAST-Q augmentation module. Clin Plast Surg 2009;36:23–32.
13. Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. A closer look at the BREAST-Q©. Clin Plast Surg 2013;40:287–96.
14. Alderman AK, Bauer J, Fardo D, et al. Understanding the effect of breast augmentation on quality of life: prospective analysis using the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;133:787–95.
16. Sullivan T, Smith J, Kermode J, et al. Rating the burn scar. J Burn Care Rehabil 1990;11:256–60.
17. Fearmonti R, Bond J, Erdmann D, et al. A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Eplasty 2010;10:e43.
18. Beausang E, Floyd H, Dunn KW, et al. A new quantitative scale for clinical scar assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:1954–61.
19. Anderson RC, Cunningham B, Tafesse E, et al. Validation of the Breast Evaluation Questionnaire for use with breast surgery patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:597–602.
21. Cohen WA, Mundy LR, Ballard TN, et al. The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009-2015. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016;69:149–62.
22. Alderman A, Pusic A, Murphy DK. Prospective analysis of primary breast augmentation on body image using the BREAST-Q: results from a nationwide study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016;137:954e–960e.
23. Sarwer DB, LaRossa D, Bartlett SP, et al. Body image concerns of breast augmentation patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:83–90.
24. Bengtson BP. The Natrelle 401 highly cohesive form-stable gel implant for primary breast augmentation. In: Spear SL, Willey SC, Robb GL, et al., editors. Surgery of the breast: principles and art. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2017. p.1346–65.
25. Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, et al. Natrelle style 410 form-stable silicone breast implants: core study results at 6 years. Aesthet Surg J 2012;32:709–17.